Overview:
In
early 2026, a mid-sized company discovered that its new AI resume screening
tool had been advancing 74% of male applicants and only 38% of female
applicants to the interview stage — for the same roles, with the same
qualifications. Nobody programmed the tool to do that. Nobody even noticed for
six weeks. The company is now in the middle of a very uncomfortable
conversation with employment counsel, and the tool is sitting on a shelf.
That
scenario is not unusual anymore. It is the new normal. Artificial intelligence
is already shaping employment decisions across recruiting, screening,
performance management, promotion, discipline, and termination — often before
HR realizes the tool is there or understands how much weight it is carrying.
And in 2026, the regulatory environment has shifted faster than most HR teams
have tracked. California's FEHA regulations took effect in October 2025.
Illinois HB 3773 and Texas HB 149 both took effect in January 2026. Colorado's
AI Act takes effect in June 2026. NYC's Department of Consumer and Worker
Protection is entering a stricter enforcement phase following a damaging state
Comptroller audit in December 2025. The EEOC's first AI enforcement action has
already settled. Major class actions are pending against Workday and Eightfold
on legal theories that could reshape vendor liability across the entire
industry.
If
your organization uses AI in any employment function — or relies on vendor
tools that quietly embed AI without your knowledge — you are now operating in
an environment where the gap between "we use AI" and "we use AI
compliantly" is where the liability lives. Most HR teams are not on the
wrong side of that line intentionally. They are on the wrong side because
nobody mapped the tools, nobody asked the vendor the right questions, and
nobody built the documentation that would hold up under scrutiny. The defense
of "we didn't know" is not going to work when a regulator or
plaintiff's counsel asks what diligence was performed.
This
session is built to close that gap. It is not an AI overview, not a trend
discussion, and not a keynote. It is a working session for HR professionals who
need to understand their current exposure, recognize where AI is making
decisions they can't see, and build the governance controls that will hold up
under regulatory or litigation scrutiny. Over three hours, you will work
through the federal legal framework, the six most important state and local
compliance regimes, the real cases already shaping the law, a complete vendor
due diligence framework, a bias audit methodology with worked examples, five
real-world scenarios showing how AI-driven discrimination actually occurs, and
a 30-day action plan your HR team can begin executing Monday morning.
Whether
your organization is evaluating new tools, already using AI-enabled systems, or
simply trying to understand hidden exposure in existing HR workflows, this
session will leave you with a clearer framework for identifying risk, asking
better questions, and building more defensible employment practices.
Areas covered in the session:
- The 2026 AI compliance landscape and what changed in the last twelve months
- Where AI is embedded across the employment lifecycle —
from sourcing to termination
- How Title VII, the ADA, and the ADEA apply to AI-driven
employment decisions, including what the EEOC's 2025 guidance rescission does
and does not change
- California FEHA regulations, Colorado AI Act, Texas HB
149, Illinois HB 3773, NYC Local Law 144, and Maryland's facial recognition law
- The Eightfold FCRA class action and what it means for
AI hiring scores
- The Workday collective action and the "vendor as
agent" ruling
- The Intuit/HireVue ACLU complaint and what it raises
about automated speech recognition in employment assessments
- Why disability and accommodation are the biggest blind
spots in AI-driven hiring
- The three ADEA risk zones: experience cap, invisible
wall, and cost-cutter layoffs
- Job ad targeting and the pre-applicant pipeline problem
- How disparate impact arises without intent — and why
that's enough for liability
- Proxy variables, historical training data, and how bias
gets encoded into neutral tools
- A vendor due diligence framework with the specific
questions HR should ask
- Risk-based governance: which tools need full audits,
which need monitoring only
- What meaningful human review looks like — and what
rubber-stamping looks like
- Notice, transparency, and documentation requirements
across jurisdictions
- Five real-world scenarios showing exactly where AI use
goes wrong
- A 30-day implementation roadmap with week-by-week
actions
- Long-term governance, monitoring, and manager training
practices
Exclusive
Handouts:
AI in
HR Risk Assessment and Decision-Mapping Workbook
Vendor
Due Diligence Questionnaire for AI-Enabled HR Tools
Why
should you attend?
You
should attend because by the end of this session, you will be able to walk into
a vendor meeting and ask the questions that separate a defensible AI tool from
a liability waiting to happen — and recognize the vague, evasive answers that
should make you walk away. You will know how to inventory the AI already
operating inside your HR stack, classify each tool by risk level, and decide
where to apply tight oversight versus where to apply lighter monitoring. You
will leave with a working understanding of the 4/5ths rule, the disparate
impact framework, and the proxy variables that quietly encode discrimination
into seemingly neutral systems.
You
should attend if you have ever sat in a meeting where someone described an AI
hiring tool as "bias-free" and you weren't sure how to respond. If
you have inherited vendor relationships you did not negotiate and contracts you
have not had time to review against the new regulatory landscape. If you have
been asked by your CHRO, your CEO, or your board what your AI compliance
posture looks like and you have not been confident in the answer. This session
will give you the vocabulary, the framework, and the documentation discipline
to respond to those moments with authority.
Most
importantly, you will leave with a 30-day plan you can begin executing Monday
morning, a vendor due diligence questionnaire you can use in your next
procurement conversation, and a risk-mapping workbook that gives your HR team a
structured starting point. The goal is not to make you an AI expert. The goal
is to make you the HR professional who knows exactly what to do next — which is
what compliance actually requires in 2026.
Who
will benefit?
This
webinar is designed for HR, talent, compliance, legal, and people-operations
professionals who help select, manage, oversee, or rely on technology that may
influence employment decisions. It is especially relevant for those responsible
for hiring, screening, performance management, workplace investigations,
documentation, discipline, accommodations, governance, and vendor oversight —
those include:
- Chief
Human Resources Officers/Vice Presidents of Human Resources
- Human
Resources Directors/Senior Human Resources Managers
- Human
Resources Business Partners/Employee Relations Directors/Employee Relations
Managers
- Talent
Acquisition Directors/Talent Acquisition Managers
- Recruiting
Directors/Recruiting Managers
- Staffing
Managers/Workforce Planning Managers
- People
Operations Directors/People Operations Managers
- HR
Operations Directors/HR Operations Managers/HR Compliance Directors
- HR
Compliance Managers/Employment Compliance Managers
- Workplace
Investigations Managers/HR Policy Managers
- HRIS
Directors/HRIS Managers
- People
Analytics Directors/People Analytics Managers
- Compensation
and Performance Management Managers/Learning and Development Directors
- Organizational
Development Managers/Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Directors
- Accommodation
and Leave Managers/In-House Employment Counsel
- Labor
and Employment Counsel/Corporate Compliance Officers
- Risk
Management Directors/Internal Audit Leaders for HR/Employment Processes
- Talent
Technology Directors/HR Technology Managers
- Vendor Risk Managers involved in HR systems
- Recruitment Operations Managers/Talent Intelligence Managers/People Strategy Directors
Eric
Caldwell is an Employment Compliance Advisor with over 20 years of experience
helping organizations manage workplace risk, strengthen employment practices,
and make more defensible HR decisions.
Throughout
his career, Eric has advised employers across a wide range of industries on
some of the most sensitive and high-stakes areas of workforce compliance,
including employee handbook development, multi-state policy alignment, wage and
hour issues, leave administration, workplace investigations, manager
documentation, disciplinary processes, policy enforcement, and employee
relations risk management. In recent years, that work has increasingly included
helping employers think through the compliance and decision-making risks that
arise when AI-enabled tools begin influencing recruiting, screening,
documentation, performance management, and other HR workflows.
Eric is known for his ability to translate complex compliance concerns into practical guidance that employers can apply in day-to-day operations. His sessions focus not only on what the rules require, but on how organizations should review, question, document, and oversee workplace practices when new technologies are introduced into employment decision-making. That practical perspective makes his guidance especially relevant for employers trying to move forward with modern HR tools without losing sight of fairness, consistency, and compliance risk.
Enrollment Options
Tags: AI in HR, Employment Compliance, HR Technology, Recruiting Compliance, AI Risk Management, Hiring and Screening, Workplace Compliance, Employment Decisions, HR Governance, Bias and Discrimination, Human Oversight, Vendor Risk, Performance Management, ADA Compliance, Title VII Compliance, eric caldwell, may 2026, webinar

