Overview:
Every
questionable leave case creates two records.
The
first is the one you think you have: the request, the certification, the
absence dates, the manager’s notes, the emails, and the decision you made at
the time. It looks complete. It feels fine.
The
second is the one someone else reads months later — an attorney, an agency, a
court — and it gets asked much harder questions. Was the employee treated like
everyone else? Was the medical information handled the right way? Were the
call-in rules applied consistently? Was recertification used properly? Did
anyone consider ADA obligations once FMLA ran out? Were Workers’ Compensation
restrictions, modified duty, or return-to-work issues handled consistently? Was
the decision built on facts, or does it read like punishment for taking
protected leave?
Most
employers never see that second record until they are sitting in front of it.
And by then, the gap between the two may become the whole problem.
This
is where leave abuse quietly becomes the employer’s problem instead of the
employee’s. The absences that always land on Mondays, Fridays, and the day
before a holiday. The certification that says too little. The return-to-work
date that keeps sliding. The restrictions that never lift. A manager who is
certain the system is being worked. The instinct is to act — but suspicion is
not a record, and acting without one is how a defensible decision can become an
expensive one.
The
challenge is that these cases rarely stay inside one law. A leave file may
begin as an FMLA entitlement issue, continue as an ADA accommodation question,
and still be shaped by Workers’ Compensation restrictions, medical updates,
modified duty, or return-to-work concerns. Treating those obligations
separately can create gaps. Treating them together requires a process the
employer can explain later.
Recent
court decisions have made one thing clear: employers can win these cases, but
the record matters. An employer may be able to act on suspected FMLA abuse when
the decision rests on a reasonable, well-documented belief and a fair process.
An employer also may not have to hold a job open indefinitely when leave
continues with no clear path back to work. In both situations, the outcome
depends heavily on what the employer did before making the final decision.
That
is exactly what this session is built to address. Janette Levey Frisch, an
employment attorney with more than twenty years of legal experience and over a
decade in employment law, has spent her career helping employers close the gap
between those two records before anyone outside the company ever reads either
one. In this focused session, she will explain what legally counts as leave
abuse and what only looks suspicious, how to read red flags without
overreaching, how to use certifications and recertifications properly, how long
a job may need to be held open, and when investigation, discipline, or
termination may be defensible.
This
is not a basic FMLA refresher. It is for HR professionals, managers, leave
administrators, and business owners who need to know what to do when leave
turns suspicious, drags on, strains the operation, or raises hard questions
about job protection, accommodation, Workers’ Compensation coordination, and
discipline.
You
may not control who reads the record later. But you can control what they find
when they do.
By
attending, you'll learn:
- Define
what legally constitutes leave abuse — and what does not
- Recognize
common red flags without jumping to unsupported conclusions
- Manage
intermittent leave effectively and consistently
- Use
certifications, recertifications, and call-in procedures lawfully and
strategically
- Strengthen
documentation to support defensible decisions
- Navigate
how long a job must be held open under FMLA and ADA
- Evaluate
when extended leave may become an undue hardship
- Conduct
appropriate investigations into suspected misuse
- Apply
lawful discipline or termination where justified
- Reduce
exposure to FMLA, ADA, and workers’ compensation claims
Handouts:
Attendees will gain access to exclusive handouts, including presentation materials provided by the speaker and additional resources developed by Amorit Education to aid your teams in post-session implementation.
Why
should you attend?
Attend
this session if you are responsible for making, reviewing, or defending leave
decisions that cannot be handled by policy alone. This is not another
walk-through of basic FMLA rules. It is about learning how to pressure-test a
difficult leave decision before the organization acts.
You
will learn how to ask the right questions when leave appears suspicious,
prolonged, or poorly supported: Is the concern based on facts or assumptions?
Is the documentation strong enough? Were the rules applied consistently? Has
the employer considered ADA and Workers’ Compensation obligations along with
FMLA? Is the next step defensible if challenged later?
This
session will help you bring more structure to the moments that often create the
greatest risk: suspected misuse, incomplete medical information, repeated
intermittent absences, extended leave, return-to-work uncertainty, and manager
pressure to “do something.” You will leave with a clearer way to evaluate the
file, guide internal communication, and make decisions that are more
consistent, better documented, and easier to support.
Who will benefit?
This
webinar is designed for professionals responsible for managing employee leave,
evaluating return-to-work issues, responding to suspected leave misuse, and
reducing legal exposure when FMLA, ADA, and Workers’ Compensation obligations
overlap. Those include:
- HR
Managers
- HR
Directors
- HR
Generalists
- HR
Business Partners
- Leave
of Absence Managers
- Leave
Administrators
- Benefits
Administrators
- Employee
Relations Managers
- Employee
Relations Specialists
- Compliance
Managers
- Employment
Law Compliance Professionals
- Risk
Managers
- Workers’
Compensation Coordinators
- Workers’
Compensation Managers
- Payroll
Managers involved in leave coordination
- Payroll
Compliance Professionals
- Operations Managers involved in staffing and absence decisions
- Department
Managers responsible for employee attendance issues
- Supervisors
who manage intermittent leave or return-to-work concerns
- Business
Owners
- Small
Business HR Administrators
- In-House
Counsel
- Employment
Counsel
- Labor
and Employment Law Advisors
Janette
Levey Frisch, The EmpLAWyerologist Firm’s Founder, has over 20 years of legal experience,
more than 10 of which she has spent in Employment Law. It was during her tenure
as sole in-house counsel for a mid-size staffing company headquartered in
Central New Jersey,
with
operations all over the continental US, that she truly developed her passion
for Employment Law.
Janette
and The EmpLAWyerologist Firm operate under this core belief: It is possible,
and it is in an employer’s best interest, to proactively solve workforce
challenges before they become problems, before they result in lawsuits or steep
fines caused by government audits.
Janette
works with employers on most employment law issues, acting as the Employer’s
Legal Wellness Professional — to ensure that employers are in the best position
possible to avoid litigation, audits, employee relations problems, and the
attendant, often exorbitant costs. Janette authors the firm’s weekly blog,
where you can read each week, in plain English (not legalese) about issues
impacting employers today. Janette has written articles on many different
employment law issues for many publications, including EEO Insight, Staffing Industry
Review, @Law, and Chief Legal Officer.
Janette has also spoken and trained on topics, such as Criminal Background Checks in the Hiring Process, Joint Employment, Severance Arrangements, Pre-Employment Screening among many, many others.
Enrollment Options
Tags: FMLA, ADA, Workers Compensation, Leave Abuse, Intermittent Leave, Employee Leave Management, HR Compliance, Employment Law, ADA Accommodation, FMLA Recertification, Return to Work, Extended Leave, Janette Levey Frisch, June 2026, Leave Investigation, Workplace Compliance, Employee Relations, Job Protection, Undue Hardship, HR Training, Legal Compliance, Manager Training,

